Reflections on the Year 2008
H. William Batt
[Reprinted from
GroundSwell, November-December 2008]
I sit in a strategic spot from which to look out at New York State
politics, and one might think that my position here would give me
much more access than it does. The reality is that the legislators
here are not very available except to those who are able to pay to
attend their various receptions and campaign rallies. But even if
one does manage to capture their attention, sustaining their
interest in an idea so "outside the box" as land value
taxation is an even greater challenge. Most of them, frankly, don't
have the diligence or interest to really study something so outside
their preconceptions; so one is better off talking with one of their
staffs. The staffers, in contrast, are often just out of graduate
school, intellectually curious and idealistic, just the kind of
subjects we should want to reach. Having once served among them in a
somewhat comparable capacity, I'm often given entree to talk with
them, especially when times are slower. I'd be lots more successful
however, if I had better graphics and data to explicate our views;
that's why I make continuous appeals to members of our movement for
help in assembling such materials.
This year I faced the challenge of getting a commission appointed
by the Governor in January to look beyond conventional solutions for
property tax relief. Governor Spitzer, who soon thereafter would
suffer an ignominious downfall, appointed his erstwhile primary
rival, Nassau County Chief Executive Thomas Suozzi, to head a
Commission on Property Tax Relief, to recommend to him and the
legislature by December ways to mitigate the property tax burdens of
homeowners. A mid-year interim report in June foretold what was
finally coming in December: a property tax cap of 4% and a circuit
breaker, despite their being ineffective in other states.
Four hearings held as the commission travelled the state were
replete with stories of poor widows being driven out of their homes,
of the incongruities between property taxes and income levels, and
of the disparities between one region of the state and another. I
testified as long as I was allowed at one of the hearings -- about
five minutes -- and wrote about twelve papers for consideration of
the Commission's staff under my name). But only one of the staffers
had any real understanding of economics, and taking on the forces
pressing for relief by conventional means was a daunting at best.
But then came the crash in the state's economy, ensuring that little
if any action to cut taxes could be enacted this year: the state
suddenly faces shortfalls for the next three years amounting to the
tens of billions! Not only do governments need every cent they can
get to balance its budgets, the crash in property values makes it
all but impossible to re-establish tax equity by quick
re-assessments. The quandary faced governments at all levels, local,
county, and state, will now have little chance of adopting short-run
fiscal remedies of any sort.
At the time the conclusions were being finalized, I sought lastly
to demonstrate how unreliable and unfair the assessments are, so
that understanding these problems might delay the enactment of
measures that would compound the difficulties. Fortunately, I've
connected with a proficient GIS technical person willing to work
with me to address some of the challenges of this order. Together we
have created land value maps of cities in the upstate area
portraying how haphazardly the land assessments are performed. Given
that buildings are continually depreciating and that land accounts
for the growth in property values, getting those assessments
consistent and accurate is pivotal in the institution of land value
taxation, or for the conventional property tax for that matter. We
have been able to put several sample cities online - see
urbantools.org. -- and also able to present to the association of
NYS GIS techies an explanation of what they can do using their tools
to help assessors perform their jobs well. This has already yielded
two more maps of upstate New York cities by an attendee who rose to
the challenge. Seeing these maps puts assessors and revenue
administrators on notice that better performance is called for if
fair taxation is to obtain. We also managed to use GIS to map land
values and simulate LVT in New London, CT.
At the same time, New York State, together with other Northeastern
States, instituted an air pollution solution now unique in the
nation. Under the acronym RGGI, for Regional Greenhouse Gas
Initiative, emissions of CO2 are being auctioned off both to raise
public revenue and reduce noxious and climate-changing discharges.
For the first round of carbon auctions, the final price of sale was
$3.07 per ton. More auctions are to follow. This program deserves
more exploration in terms of its Georgist dimensions: it could be
interpreted as a simple Coasian payment for polluting. On the other
hand, it might also be viewed as rental of air sinks. Either way, it
warrants further explication.
On still another front, the overcrowding of airspace and traffic
for the New York's three airports -- LaGuardia, Kennedy, and Newark
-- has prompted the Federal Aeronautics Administration to press the
New York Port Authority to auction off the landing slots that
various airlines now regard as their own. The Port Authority has
strenuously resisted change, and the date of the first auction has
been postponed once already. This difference in market philosophy
represents a titanic struggle among some of the behemoths of the
airline industry. It has not been viewed at all in Georgist terms,
but it deserves to be. Again, it offers the prospect of not only
improving the efficiency of airport operations but raising more
revenue for their maintenance and operations. But the champion of
auctions, Transportation Secretary Mary Peters, will leave office at
the end of the Bush administration, and New York Senator Chuck
Schumer, a vehement opponent of the scheme, has promised to protect
the airline industry. But as air traffic becomes ever more
congested, the final hour of decision is fast approaching for
resolution of air resource allocation here as well.
Desperate circumstances may offer opportunities to political
leaders willing to look with fresh eyes at the challenges. The
dilemmas are not likely to be resolved quickly -- if anything, they
stand to worsen. Already, some soundings have echoed back to me and
to others in our network, showing that there is recognition that
present arrangements don't work. There's always a chance that some
fortunes will break our way, that one of the several dozen small
cities in New York State now in dire financial straits will give up
their hope for state or federal bailouts, or for some other mystical
solutions to come over the horizon. Resources that are recognizably
part of the commons are being pressed to collapse, and methods for
allocation and use need to be rethought. Each year it becomes more
obvious that the conventional solutions, and the intellectual
paradigms on which they rest, are untenable. Each year also, our
alternate approach gains credence and momentum to offer evidence of
answers we are confident in proposing.
One of the last most exciting experiences to me was meeting a
brilliant professor of law from Cornell who gave the Henry George
Seminar at The University of Scranton in the spring of this year.
Bob Hockett offered to Wyn Achenbaum and me during a breakfast chat
that he is ninety percent comfortable with Georgist ideas. In
preparing to meet him, we read some of his monographs distinguishing
between endowments that were ethically endogenous and ethically
exogenous. By this he meant entitlements to which we have a moral
claim to, i.e., the result of our own efforts and those that are
privileges that we might possess but which our claim to is somewhat
problematic. He managed to weave three difficult papers offered to
us in advance, each over a hundred pages, into a coherent
presentation that was, to us, just beautiful. The exciting part
about meeting him was his ability to articulate the Georgist
philosophy in both abstract and yet in very operational language.
The hope both of us came away with is that we can continue a
relationship supportive of Bob?s intellectual pursuits, especially
as they relate also to our agenda.
Our philosophy needs both operational demonstration and
intellectual grounding. This year I had the chance to see both
developments, exciting possibilities even if not all successful.