E.B. Gaston and Cooperative Individualism
Paul Gaston
[2005]
Cooperative individualism is a term used by E. B. Gaston." I
assume you got that information from my book, Man and Mission. So far
as I was able to discover (from all the sources I plundered plus
inquiries to several historians of the late 19th century) only one
other person, an obscure Iowan, used the term before EBG. I'd be
interested to know if you or anyone on your list knows of others who
wrote of "cooperative individualism."
As I point out in the book, EBG came to what he called "cooperative
individualism" out of his original advocacy of a Bellamy-like
socialist colony and his subsequent experience with the Populist
Party. In fact, Fairhope was really a creation of Iowa Populists,
sitting around the stove in the office of the Farmers Tribune. (As you
know, Henry George was no fan of the Populists.) EBG was searching for
that elusive balance between unfettered individualism (which he
regarded as the great curse of his time) and excessive community
control (which he felt was the flaw in his earlier plan for his
Bellamy-like colony, the "National Cooperative Company").
Hamlin Garland was one of his great champions (and Joe Fels Fairhope's
greatest benefactor), but many (perhaps most) single taxers of the
time rejected his ideas because of the stress on cooperation (communal
ownership and operation of most public services, among other things).
Two prominent "individualist" single taxers, Brokaw and
Springer, came to Fairhope and almost succeeded in destroying it. Most
of the few people who have studied the relationship between Fairhope
and the national single tax movement conclude that the failure of the
movement to support Fairhope stemmed from the belief (held by George
himself) that the cause could not be helped by small "demonstrations."
They would fail, George believed, and thereby discredit the ideas they
were established to demonstrate. Another, and equally important,
reason, I believe, was the suspicion, in those early years, that
Fairhope was not simon-pure single tax. Which, of course, it was not.
The "cooperators," on the other hand, suspected that it was
too far over on the "individualist" side and many withheld
their support. Caught between these two ideological poles, EBG was
never able to raise enough outside support to make Fairhope the "model
community" he so eloquently outlined in the constitution and in
his essay on "True Cooperative Individualism."
|