Social Problems
Henry George
[1883 / Chapter 21 / Conclusion]
[01] HERE, it seems to me, is the gist and meaning of the great
social problems of our time: More is given to us than to any people at
any time before; and, therefore, more is required of us. We have made,
and still are making, enormous advances on material lines. It is
necessary that we commensurately advance on moral lines. Civilization,
as it progresses, requires a higher conscience, a keener sense of
justice, a warmer brotherhood, a wider, loftier, truer public spirit.
Falling these, civilization must pass into destruction. It cannot be
maintained on the ethics of savagery. For civilization knits men more
and more closely together, and constantly tends to subordinate the
individual to the whole, and to make more and more important social
conditions.
[02] The social and political problems that confront us are darker
than they realize who have not given thought to them; yet their
solution is a mere matter of the proper adjustment of social forces.
Man masters material nature studying her laws, and in conditions and
powers that seemed most forbidding, has already found his richest
storehouses and most powerful servants. Although we have but begun to
systematize our knowledge of physical nature, it is evident she will
refuse us no desire if we but seek its gratification in accordance
with her laws.
[03] And that faculty of adapting means to ends which has enabled man
to convert the once impassable ocean into his highway, to transport
himself with a speed which leaves the swallow behind, to annihilate
space in the communication of his thoughts, to convert the rocks into
warmth and light and power and material for a thousand uses, to weigh
the stars and analyze the sun, to make ice under the equator, and bid
flowers bloom in Northern winters, will also, if he will use it,
enable him to overcome social difficulties and avoid social dangers.
The domain of law is not confined to physical nature. It just as
certainly embraces the mental and moral universe, and social growth
and social life have their laws as fixed as those of matter and of
motion. Would we make social life healthy and happy, we must discover
those laws, and seek our ends in accordance with them.
[04] I ask no one who may read this book to accept my views. I ask
him to think for himself.
[05] Whoever, laying aside prejudice and self-interest, will honestly
and carefully make up his own mind as to the causes and the cure of
the social evils that are so apparent, does, in that, the most
important thing in his power toward their removal. This primary
obligation devolves upon us individually, as citizens and as men.
Whatever else we may be able to do, this must come first. For "if
the blind lead the blind, they both shall fall into the ditch."
[06] Social reform is not to be secured by noise and shouting; by
complaints and denunciation; by the formation of parties, or the
making of revolutions; but by the awakening of thought and the
progress of ideas. Until there be correct thought, there cannot be
right action; and when there is correct thought, right action will
follow. Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What
oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted
selfishness.
[07] The great work of the present for every man, and every
organization of men, who would improve social conditions, is the work
of education - the propagation of ideas. It is only as it aids this
that anything else can avail. And in this work every one who can think
may aid - first by forming clear ideas himself, and then by
endeavoring to arouse the thought of those with whom he comes in
contact.
[08] Many there are, too depressed, too embruted with hard toil and
the struggle for animal existence, to think for themselves. Therefore
the obligation devolves with all the more force on those who can. If
thinking men are few, they are for that reason all the more powerful.
Let no man imagine that he has no influence. Whoever he may be, and
wherever he may be placed, the man who, thinks becomes a light and a
power. That for every idle word men may speak they shall give an
account at the day of judgment, seems a hard saying. But what more
clear than that the theory of the persistence of force, which teaches
us that every movement continues to act and react, must apply as well
to the universe of mind as to that of matter? Whoever becomes imbued
with a noble idea kindles a flame from which other torches are lit,
and influences those with whom he comes in contact, be they few or
many. How far that influence, thus perpetuated, may extend, it is not
given to him here to see. But it may be that the Lord of the Vineyard
will know.
[09] As I said in the first of these chapters, the progress of
civilization necessitates the giving of greater and greater attention
and intelligence to public affairs. And for this reason I am convinced
that we make a great mistake in depriving one sex of voice in public
matters, and that we could in no way so increase the attention, the
intelligence and the devotion which may be brought to the solution of
social problems as by enfranchising our women. Even if in a ruder
state of society the intelligence of one sex suffices for the
management of common interests, the vastly more intricate, more
delicate and more important questions which the progress of
civilization makes of public moment, require the intelligence of women
as of men, and that we never can obtain until we interest them in
public affairs. And I have come to believe that very much of the
inattention, the flippancy, the want of conscience, which we see
manifested in regard to public matters of the greatest moment, arises
from the fact that we debar our women from taking their proper part in
these matters. Nothing will fully interest men unless it also
interests women. There are those who say that women are less
intelligent than men; but who will say that they are less influential?
[10] And I am firmly convinced, as I have already said, that to
effect any great social improvement, it is sympathy rather than
self-interest, the sense of duty rather than the desire for
self-advancement, that must be appealed to. Envy is akin to
admiration, and it is the admiration that the rich and powerful excite
which secures the perpetuation of aristocracies. Where tenpenny Jack
looks with contempt upon ninepenny Joe, the social injustice which
makes the masses of the people hewers of wood and drawers of water for
a privileged few, has the strongest bulwarks. It is told of a certain
Florentine agitator that when he had received a new pair of boots, he
concluded that all popular grievances were satisfied. How often do we
see this story illustrated anew in working-men's movements and
trade-union struggles? This is the weakness of all movements that
appeal only to self-interest.
[11] And as man is so constituted that it is utterly impossible for
him to attain happiness save by seeking the happiness of others, so
does it seem to be of the nature of things that individuals and
classes can obtain their own just rights only by struggling for the
rights of others. To illustrate: When workmen in any trade form a
trades-union, they gain, by subordinating the individual interests of
each to the common interests of all, the power of making better terms
with employers. But this power goes only a little way when the
combination of the trades-union is met and checked by the pressure for
employment of those outside its limits. No combination of workmen can
raise their own wages much above the level of ordinary wages. The
attempt to do so is like the attempt to bail out a boat without
stopping up the seams. For this reason, it is necessary, if workmen
would accomplish anything real and permanent for themselves, not
merely that each trade should seek the common interests of all trades,
but that skilled workmen should address themselves to those general
measures which will improve the condition of unskilled workmen. Those
who are most to be considered, those for whose help the struggle must
be made, if labor is to be enfranchised, and social justice won, are
those least able to help or struggle for themselves, those who have no
advantage of property or skill or intelligence,- the men and women who
are at the very bottom of the social scale. In securing the equal
rights of these we shall secure the equal rights of all.
[12] Hence it is, as Mazzini said, that it is around the standard of
duty rather than around the standard of self-interest that men must
rally to win the rights of man. And herein may we see the deep
philosophy of Him who bade men love their neighbors as themselves.
[13] In that spirit, and in no other, is the power to solve social
problems and carry civilization onward.
|