On Rent
Adam Smith
[Reprinted from The Wealth of Nations,
Section 18, page 833, 1776]
The discouragement which a variable land tax of this kind might give
to the improvement of land, seems to be the most important objection
which can be made to it. The landlord would certainly be less disposed
to improve, when the sovereign, who contributed nothing to the
expense, was to share in the profit of the improvement. Even this
objection might perhaps be obviated by allowing the landlord, before
he began his improvements, to ascertain, in conjunction with the
officers of revenue, the actual value of his lands, according to the
equitable arbitration of a certain number of landlords and farmers in
the neighborhood, equally chosen by both parties; and by rating him
according to this valuation for such a number of years, as might be
fully sufficient for his complete indemnification." "Both
ground-rents and the ordinary rent of land are a species of revenue
which the owner, in many cases, enjoys without any care or attention
of his own. Though a part of this revenue should be taken from him in
order to defray the expenses of the state, no discouragement will
thereby be given to any sort of industry....
Ground-rents and the ordinary rent of land are, therefore, perhaps,
the species of revenue which can best bear to have a peculiar tax
imposed upon them.
|