Governments and the People
Henry Ware Allen
[Reprinted from Land and Freedom,
November-December 1939]
IN every age of history there has been a strong contrast between the
behavior of governments and the behavior of the people governed. As a
result of the salutary influence of religion and culture upon the
individual citizen this contrast has now, perhaps, become greater than
ever before. If it be true that corporations have no souls, then it
must follow that governments, the greatest of all corporations, having
no respect for any higher power and no fear of punishment have been
able to operate upon the premise that might is right. And it should be
remembered that corporations are much more individualistic and
therefore more personally responsible than are governments,
particularly the larger ones. For corporations are in a great degree
amenable to the rule that honesty is the best policy and society
benefits accordingly. Their prosperity if not their very existence is
regulated by the beneficent law of competition.
The case is different with governments, for they do not have to
depend upon financial profits resulting from good management, they
have to pay no taxes, and are not supervised with inquisitorial zeal
by any higher authority. Governments do not keep their books by
double-entry and have no concern over profit or loss. Their tendency
is always toward greater expense and extravagance with resulting
heavier taxes upon the people. Governments are not influenced by those
considerations which apply in greater or less degree to corporations
and to the individual for the regulation of good conduct and sound
citizenship. Governments, on the other hand, have usually been guided
in their destinies by rulers and diplomats with selfish ambitions and
unscrupulous methods. The record of every known government provides
ample testimony to this. History is replete with the records of bloody
wars in which the participants not only had no rightful interest but
no real interest of any kind.
Discipline is a necessary condition of survival in primitive and
modern civilization alike and in consequence of this it is natural for
all men to obey their rulers. Particularly where the government has
been of &. religious character as in the days of Moses or where
there has been a union of Church and State, a peculiar sanctity has
been added to all governmental edicts leading to the conclusion that
the King can do no wrong. This has made it possible for tyrants to
increase, insidiously, their power at the expense of the governed.
Considering the matter in its larger aspect we behold a world
provided by a beneficent Creator with abundant natural riches of all
kinds available for the use of man simply by the exercise of that
intelligence with which he is endowed, with ample room for all, so
that there is not today, nor has there ever been any valid excuse for
the encroachment of one people upon another, nor for the tyranny
exercised by governments upon the people. It is therefore only
reasonable to believe that the Creator assumed, in view of all that He
had provided for the needs, the comfort, and the happiness of mankind,
that men would naturally live together in peace and harmony, with
goodwill toward one another.
Concentrating our attention upon the civilized world of today,
composed as it largely is of men highly skilled in the arts and
sciences and personally animated by nothing less than goodwill to
their neighbors and actuated by the principle of live and let live, we
find governments sacrificing their people in relentless warfare waged
upon others for the purpose of securing by flagrant robbery and
murder, territory and property which might have been legitimately
secured by purchase with far less expenditure than was made necessary
by warfare to say nothing of the frightful loss of life suffered on
both sides, by men who otherwise might have been good citizens if not,
indeed, men of distinction. Other governments, animated by equal
tyranny, are today terrorizing and expatriating hundreds of thousands
of their own peace-abiding citizens for no other reason excepting
those of racial and religious bigotry, and at least one other great
government is murdering thousands of its more intelligent citizens
upon suspicion that they have been disloyal to or are planning to
overthrow that government. In all these countries the unalienable
right of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness by the exercise
of freedom of the press and of free speech has been denied, two great
governments having also deprived the people of the right to worship
God as they pleased, while between all these countries their
governments have erected huge tariff walls having the direct effect of
increasing the cost of all commodities, of depriving many of the
necessities of life, and of creating intergovernmental antagonism,
discord, and hatred.
But it is neither necessary to our contention nor is it fair for us
to concentrate our attention elsewhere when there is so much to
criticize and to remedy in the misbehavior of government right here in
the United States. Our own government has been more or less guilty of
most of the crimes which have appeared to us so great in other
governments.
It has been truly said that every great institution is the shadow of
some great mind. And it is equally true that as a rule, the employees
of every business institution reflect the personality, the character
and the attitude of the head of the firm. In line with this idea it is
equally true that the character of any government is reflected in
great degree upon the people under that government. To the degree to
which the government is honorable and just will that influence be
reflected upon that people, and if the government habitually breaks
the moral code, the effect upon the people cannot be other than bad.
An example has been set which naturally will be followed.
At a time, therefore, when crime is steadily on the increase may we
not place a large portion of the blame against a government which
systematically diverts public revenue to private individuals without
compensation, and at the same time employs a system of taxation which
is essentially a system of robbery from first to last.
We have only to make a comparison between the right way employed by
individual citizens in their relations one to another with the method
employed by governments to demonstrate how criminally wrong is the
latter. For example, suppose merchants should fix their prices in
accordance with the ability to pay, how quickly would the procedure be
condemned as both wrong and absurd, yet that is precisely the
time-honored method employed by governments in raising a large share
of its revenue. The rule that should be followed is, of course, for
the government to impose the tax, just as the merchant fixes a price,
in accordance with the value of the merchandise or of the services
rendered. Fortunately, this is accurately registered by land values.
Other comparisons may serve to illustrate the absurdity of many
governmental practices. Suppose, for example, that Mr. Jones observes
that his neighbor across the street is in an angry, sullen mood. He
immediately provides himself with a big revolver. His neighbor across
the street observing this, in order to be well prepared, provides
himself with two revolvers. This goes on until both men provide
themselves with a bodyguard whenever venturing out of the house. Most
likely some violence will ensue although both men were good neighbors
without any possible excuse for trouble until the irrational idea of
armament suggested itself. Again, let us suppose that cities and towns
should adopt from the federal government the absurd system of
protective tariffs. All men would then be penalized for the crime of
bringing wealth into their respective communities. Men would not be
allowed to trade with others across the street but only with merchants
in the same block. Commerce, one of the great factors for the creation
of wealth by the simple method of transporting merchandise from where
it has smaller value to where it has greater value, would then be
stigmatized as unpatriotic unless the trading was limited to
restricted areas. To provide for this accomplishment a new army of tax
gatherers and inquisitorial inspectors to be supported by new taxes
would have to be created.
The nearest simile to the operation of the income tax to be found in
the daily life of the people is the philosophy and procedure of the
highway robber. Like the government he does not pretend to give to his
victims the equivalent of what he takes. His principal idea is to
discover where there is wealth and then to go and get it, the only
difference being that the highwayman takes all he can get while the
government merely takes all that the traffic will bear by permitting
the victim to recoup himself for similar experiences in after years.
Double taxation is now paid, first to the landlord and secondly to
the government. Ordinary taxes are the equivalent of just so many
penalties upon the right to transact business. They act as just so
much sand thrown into the delicate mechanism of commerce. It is
exactly as though these taxes were imposed by some enemy of mankind
who was aiming to destroy prosperity, and they have precisely that
effect. It is necessary, therefore, in order that a government shall
be properly reformed that its system of taxation shall be so changed
that it will harmonize perfectly with the demands of ethics and that
it be made to conform to natural law.
The evil tendency of government to appropriate to itself abnormal
power was thoroughly understood by the founders of our nation and
particularly by Jefferson, who more than anyone else was the founder
of American democracy. More than anyone else he knew that eternal
vigilance is the price of our liberty and he illustrated this
vigilance during his first term as President when he reduced the
number of Federal office holders fifty per cent. He demonstrated that
the best government is that which governs least.
This tendency of government to exceed its normal function, to
exercise tyrannical power, and to violate the moral law can be traced
to a similar propensity in society where men have combined their
united force in order to secure illegitimate results. Gangs of boys
habitually commit acts of vandalism which no member of the gang would
be guilty of as an individual, and groups of men comprising mobs will
destroy property and take human life in complete disregard of the
moral law which no member of the mob would think of doing or dare to
do of his own initiative.
Religious organizations, family discipline and the other salutary
influences of modern civilization have accomplished a fairly good task
in training men to behave themselves with due regard to the rights of
others. Governments, on the other hand, have not had the benefit of
any discipline whatsoever. They have had license to do about as they
please in accordance with the supposition that might makes right and
that any means are justified by the desired end. It is to the founders
of the science of political economy, such men as Adam Smith, Rousseau,
Ricardo, Herbert Spencer, John Stuart Mill and Henry George that the
world is indebted for having formulated for practical use the right
rules for governmental behavior. It is to the disgrace of civilization
that these rules have been so universally disregarded up to the
present time by the Church, by our schools and colleges and by our
legislators.
A frequently stated fallacy is the pronouncement of Christian
ministers that men would be prosperous and that peace would prevail
throughout the world if men would only accept and practice the tenets
of Christianity. This idea is true only if sound principles of
political economy are applied in all the activities of government. In
fact, the personal piety of individuals will count for little as a
factor for social justice when compared to the beneficent effects of
the right behavior of government under the dominion of political
economy intelligently enforced.
|