| 
 Gilbert M. Tucker, Jr.Albany's most notable Georgist: 1880-1968
 H. William Batt
 [14 February, 2010]
 
 Albany New York's most notable Georgist was Gilbert Tucker, more
          completely Gilbert Milligan Tucker, Jr. He deserves a significant
          place in the Georgist pantheon of historic figures. He was born on
          November 3, 1880, died on February 26, 1968 at the age of 88 in
          Monterey, CA, where he'd lived for a short time, and was brought home
          to be interred in Albany Rural Cemetery family plot. He was survived
          by his wife, Mildred, of many years, but had no children.
 
 Tucker wrote six books, four on Georgist philosophy which deserve our
          attention. They are
          The Path to Prosperity (1935), For the Good of All
          (1944), Common Sense Economics (1957), and The Self
          Supporting City, (1946, revised 1958). His last two books were
          Your Money and What to Do With it (1960) and The Private
          School (1965).
 
 Writing came to him easily, as his forbears were all journalists.
          Luther Tucker, the great-grandfather, was founder of early newspapers
          in Rochester and publisher of a farming journal called The Genesee
          Farmer, later consolidated with The Country Gentleman as a
          monthly which continued until 1955. For many years it was the largest
          and most widely circulated agricultural publication in America. When
          the first Luther Tucker died in 1873, responsibility passed to his
          son, Luther H. (1834-1897). Ownership ultimately went to the great
          grandsons Luther H. and Gilbert M. Tucker, Senior (1847-1932). Tucker
          Senior wrote a book on American English, Our Common Speech in
          1895, that was an important source for H. L. Mencken's more widely
          known book on the subject published in 1919. In 1913 he offered an
          exposition of his religious ideas titled A Layman's Apology.
          His brother Willis G. (1849-1922) was one of the principal founders of
          Albany College of Pharmacy in 1881, taught at Albany Medical College
          and was Director of the lab of the New York State Board of Health.
 
 Gilbert Tucker, Jr. also led a long and interesting life as did his
          older brother by eleven years, Luther Henry Tucker. All the male
          Tuckers are identified in the records of the elite private boys'
          school, Albany Academy. Gilbert Junior graduated in 1898 with a strong
          record in French and Latin as well as the sciences. He was class
          treasurer, wrote for the literary magazine, and was on the debating
          team. The class newspaper notes that a debate result was decided in
          the affirmative with Gilbert Tucker as leader. The subject: "Resolved
          that services in the National Guard should be required of all
          able-bodied young men for a term of years." He won a second
          debate on the then timely question: "Resolved that the Charter of
          Greater New York will be of benefit to the Country." This, one
          must recall, concerned whether the five boroughs of New York should be
          consolidated as the present New York City. Gilbert would go on to
          Cornell University rather than to Williams where his father had gone,
          finishing in three years. His last book pays tribute to the quality of
          his Academy education by noting not only the "criticism and
          correction" of his writing but the literature to which he was
          introduced. (p 68) One of these authors, he notes, was Henry George.
          In a letter decades later to the Headmaster of the Academy, he again
          expressed gratitude for its honing his debating skills, noting therein
          that presiding over a gathering of "some hundreds" of
          Georgists was made easier by this training.
 
 The next time Gilbert Tucker's name appears in history is on April
          15, 1912, when he was 31, as he was one of 705 (of about 2,200) to
          survive the sinking of The Titanic. His cabin was C-53, First Class,
          strategically chosen to be near a woman he'd met in Europe and with
          whom he was purportedly smitten. The record shows that he was
          rebuffed, however, and he ultimately married at age 42 to Mildred
          Penrose Stewart. In stories about the Titanic in the Albany Times
          Union and as far away as the Baltimore American, Tucker
          was listed as a "prominent person" worthy of note. But this
          notoriety proved to be a blemish which would dog him for the rest of
          his life. He was marked as a coward, whereas others, like John Jacob
          Astor and Benjamin Guggenheim, went down with the ship. The story goes
          that he would hear mumbled "women and children first" as he
          walked through Albany, a slur given the social class of his family. It
          was made more awkward by the fact that another prominent Albanian,
          Benjamin Foreman, perished. His own account was that a half-full
          lifeboat was being lowered, and he hopped in when no others were there
          to board.
 
 During the first World War he was involved in food administration,
          and one wonders if he may have known Herbert Hoover who was director
          of the relief program. This is noted in the first edition of The
          Self Supporting City. From 1918 to 1933, he was Supervisor of
          Exhibits in the New York State Health Department's Division of Public
          Health Education. He was responsible for articles, exhibits and films
          about epidemiology and health maintenance. The Department's Health
          News noted upon his retirement that early on "Mr. Tucker
          developed the Healthmobile [sic], probably the first automobile to be
          equipped to show health motion pictures in localities where electric
          current was not available." The Department of Health films were
          shown even in the most remote sections of the State, frequently before
          people who had never seen a motion picture. Tucker's other activities
          in Albany involved editing the family's weekly magazine and work with
          the Albany Institute of History and Art.
 
 Gilbert Tucker, Jr. grew up at 304 State Street, in one of the most
          stately mansions in Albany, a brownstone built for his parents in
          1888. On the arched entrance to this Romanesque Revival house one sees
          the hand of a skilled stonecutter, likely done by one of many Italian
          artisans brought to Albany to work on the Capitol Building. Most of
          the carving depicts botanical subjects, but one snarling beast
          decorates a boss at the left edge of the bay window. In 1913 he moved
          to a 40 acre estate in the Albany suburb of Glenmont which he quaintly
          named Rockhill Farm. But he returned to the City of Albany to 158 S.
          Pine Avenue in the late 1950s and maintained an office at 128 State
          Street just downhill from the State Capitol. He had two subsequent
          offices: at 12 Pine Street, right behind the present New York State
          Court of Appeals, and later at the ornate Delaware & Hudson Rail
          Station, now the headquarters of the State University System, just
          before moving to California for the last three years of his life.
 
 Georgist philosophy was important to him. His first book, The
          Path to Prosperity, was published in 1935 at the depth of the
          depression, an experience which may have turned his fortunes as well
          as his intellectual concerns. This book shows that he was already a
          dedicated and knowledgeable Georgist; he begins his first chapter with
          a quotation from Progress and Poverty, then lays out his views
          on the plight of the nation as he saw it. His exposition of Georgist
          thought begins in Chapter VIII, and his remedy follows Henry George to
          the letter. He has no use for Roosevelt, and sees the intervention of
          government on so massive a scale as both misguided and threatening. He
          also expresses alarm at the more liberal turns in philosophy expressed
          by the Supreme Court. In the Introduction, he ends (p. xii) with the 
          following:
 
 
  "The Nation is now teetering in a dangerous
            position and time alone will tell the outcome. If we profit by
            experience and turn to justice and right, to obedience to laws and
            principles, we may yet be saved, but if, in selfish
            short-sightedness and obstinacy, we cling to fallacious ideas and
            selfish expedients, if we abandon principle and wreck the ideals
            upon which those who were wiser than we of today built the Republic,
            there can be only ruin ahead." He was in the fullest sense a classical nineteenth century liberal,
          and his exposition of Georgist thought was grounded in natural law
          every bit as much as that of George himself. At the end of Chapter VI,
          he wrote, "If we would leave these matters to work out freely in
          accordance with natural economic laws, keeping our fingers out of the
          pie, we should all be a great deal better off." He had no regard
          for social programs, believing that self-reliance, given the
          opportunities which a Georgist regime would offer, would be sufficient
          to relieve injustice and poverty.
 
 His Presbyterian faith was reflected in passages such as the
          following (p. 148):
 
 
  "That this is an ordered universe all intelligent
            persons agree. Things do not just happen but there is a regular
            sequence of events, call it cause and effect, natural law, a Divine
            Purpose or what you will. To some minds natural law is a sufficient
            explanation of it all but, to other minds, natural law is not a
            first cause but the explanation of the way in which the Primary
            Cause, call it the Divine Will or God if you like, carries out His
            purpose." It followed to him that moral law and political law must then
          conform. Toward the end of the chapter he quotes Coolidge: "Man
          does not make laws, he discovers them."
 
 In a pivotal chapter titled "The Land Privilege," he
          buttressed his argument - twice! - with passages from Blackstone. He
          then pointed out that "In recognizing the right of absolute
          ownership of land and its resources, we are denying to every man his
          natural right, his share in the ownership of those things which are
          rightfully the heritage of all." To further make his point he
          chose a quotation remaining from the New York State Constitution of
          1846 and 1894 that, "The People, in their right of sovereignty,
          are deemed to possess the original and ultimate property in and to all
          lands without the jurisdiction of the State." This language,
          deemed a vestige of feudal law culminating in New York's "rent
          wars" of the 1840s was already vitiated by other provisions, and
          was finally eliminated only in 1962. Its implications for a Georgist
          regime of taxing land rent is a subject for another place and time.
 
 Even though The Path to Prosperity is 75 years old as this
          review is written, the book is very timely. The references to events
          and issues of the time are few; rather the pages are filled largely
          with exposition of general themes and arguments. If the references to
          natural law and moral truth are dated to some, certainly his prose is
          not, making his work easily readable. He does cite a few names
          recognizable today, and his references to the spectrum, to air and
          water, and to other resources yielding "rents" make clear
          that he understands "land" in the broadest sense.
 
 Tucker's second Georgist work, For the Good of All, is half
          the size of his first Georgist piece and was completed at the height
          of the Second World War. Much of what he says earlier, is repeated, as
          Georgist thought certainly didn't change. The first chapter is titled
          "A Universe of Law," again reflecting his view that there
          are laws that govern not only the natural realm but the moral and
          political realm as well. But he spends much more effort in laying out
          what he sees as the ideals and proper role of government before then
          describing "The Great Injustice" (i.e., the usurpation of
          land rights), followed then by "The Doctrine of Henry George"
          and "Practical Benefits" (i.e., The Remedy). Almost as much
          attention is later given to advocacy of free trade before finally
          turning to a concern about world peace. Again, like the first, this
          book has a timelessness that warrants its being part of a Georgist
          compendium.
 
 Mr. Tucker would write The Self-Supporting City at the end of
          WWII, but revise it a decade later. A few copies remain available
          today from its publisher, the Robert Schalkenbach Foundation but it's
          largely forgotten. It touches on urban blight and explains how land
          value taxation can revitalize cities in flagging circumstances. Both
          editions cover the ground in about 100 pages, exploring in
          non-mathematical language what has since come to be known as the Henry
          George Theorem: that the totality of taxable rent generated in any
          urban locality is commensurate with the community requirements for its
          services. In hindsight, this is Tucker's most significant
          contribution: he unearthed an insight from Progress and Poverty
          that others had overlooked until recently. Both contain chapters on
          matters such as "the poor widow," delinquency and
          forfeiture, zoning, corruption, and slum clearance. In line with the
          thesis of its title, Tucker argues that taxing land value could
          supplant other taxes, and indeed that all the ground rent should be
          collected (p 24-25, 88,98). The first edition contains a forward by
          Lawson Purdy, a leading figure in both the Georgist movement as well
          as Director of Taxation and Assessment for New York City for decades.
          Probably because the reviews in various journals were positive, this
          book is easily accessible in libraries.
 
 He addresses the question whether to call such revenue "ground
          rent" or taxes, concluding that it's really a technical point
          with no practical difference (p 72-73). He further argues, however,
          that governments too should pay ground rents on the sites they occupy,
          simply as a matter of cleaner bookkeeping (p 93). By inference this
          would include non-profit organizations as well, but he doesn't explain
          that doing so would ensure land use efficiencies now lacking in urban
          areas. To phase in a shift to taxing land values, he first proposes
          that land assessments should be raised to their true market price. He
          also proposes public acquisition of land sites instead of forfeiture
          for unpaid taxes or delinquency (p 99), thereby leaving over-extended
          people their houses. Parts of it are superseded today by empirical
          work of the Center or the Study of Economics now based in
          Philadelphia. But no exposition of the arguments is more complete and
          better written than what The Self-Supporting City lays out.
 
 Common-Sense Economics was Tucker's last Georgist work, a
          textbook issued by the Stackpole Publishing Company in Harrisburg, one
          of a series in what was presumptuously called the Stackpole Library.
          Two others in the series had more than one printing, used at the
          college level in classes of business and economics. In twenty-eight
          chapters and just under 300 pages, Tucker's book covers the ground. I
          was fortunate in obtaining what is likely the last new copy. The dust 
          jacket lists questions reflecting subject matter: "Should Homes
          be Taxed?, Foolish Spending, Inflation and Prices, Public Revenue and
          Borrowing, The American Way or Communism, What is Wealth?, Is the
          Income Tax Fair?, Does Capital Aid Labor?, The Maligned Profit Motive,
          What is a Monopoly?, Figures, Fallacies, and Frauds, and Are We Losing
          Our Liberty?" This listing is more provocative than the actual
          chapter titles inside. As befits a textbook, each chapter ends with
          questions that invite review and understanding.
 
 Common-Sense Economics is by modern standards distinctive in
          that it is all prose text. There is not a graphic illustration or a
          mathematical formula in it. But the language is clear, and is helpful
          particularly in the detail and number of examples and illustrations
          given. Each chapter is a narrative of considerable organization and
          style, and is sufficiently commonplace in its wording that it is
          easily comprehensible. Though the sentences are often long and the 
          structure is complex, there is no reason to think that this book could
          not be easily translated into other languages and be clearly
          understood. It is characteristically Georgist in arguing that ground
          rent should support all public goods and services. Repeating his
          earlier argument, he writes, "Were the entire ground rent taken
          in lieu of taxes, it would reduce the sale price of land, possibly
          almost wipe it out, but it would increase tremendously the use-value
          of land, the benefit which results from ownership, tenure, occupation
          and use. Therefore, the landowner, if a land-user, would gain far more
          than he would lose." (p. 210) In Georgist parlance, he is very
          much a protector of property rights, the right of people to keep all
          of what they earn or buy. Today's property rights advocates, more
          interested in capturing speculative gains, would find it hard to
          understand the distinction that Tucker makes.
 
 In his later years, Tucker became vehement in his denunciation of
          socialism, and was alarmist in his view that the US was drifting
          toward a socialist political economy. He picks several illustrations,
          the TVA for example, to support this. Toward the end of the book he
          writes "The trend of socialism is always toward communism, taking
          from some to give to others in accordance with the principles of Marx,
          and we see this among the states in our own Union just as we see it
          among individuals." (p. 261) He is just as alarmed about the
          growth of the national government at the expense of state sovereignty,
          and is fixated on socialism and communism-which he regarded as
          essentially the same. Looking at all his work together one sees the
          growth of this paranoia in The Self-Supporting City.
 
 The list of suggested readings at the end of Common-Sense
          Economics is just as timebound, focusing as it does on the
          spectres of socialism and communism. Most of the suggestions reflect
          the conservative orientation that captured Georgist thought during
          this period, for example the accolades heaped upon Albert J. Nock's
          Our Enemy the State, and Herbert Spencer's Man Versus the
          State. At that time both were available from the Schalkenbach
          Foundation. In this regard, the book is not at all reflective of
          contemporary Georgism - the reading list begins, for example, with a
          recommendation for one book he deems "Excellent: shows how
          communism has penetrated our educational institutions and how
          insincere are the 'leftists' in pleading for freedom of speech,
          academic freedom, and similar high-sounding aspirations, by which they
          mean freedom for their side and for no one else." He also praises
          William F Buckley, Jr. whom he may not have known was also very much a
          Georgist. The book is dedicated to the leader of the Henry George
          School in Seattle, George Dana Linn, "in gratitude for his
          generous support, encouragement and friendship." Linn is
          sometimes mentioned in passing in Georgist accounts, but was a
          distinctly minor figure; his notability may be best remembered as a
          friend of Gilbert Tucker. Wylie Young's book, Antidote For Madness,
          published first in 1976 and again in 1999, is dedicated to Gilbert
          Tucker.
 
 Two long-time residents of the Albany community remain alive today to
          recall for me their close remembrances of Gilbert and Mildred Tucker
          after the 1950s. As a person he was small in stature, somewhat
          reserved, and yet a skirt-chaser of sorts at least in his dotage -
          something his wife tolerated with bemusement or ignored. His wife
          enrolled them in weekly dance classes which appears to have been his
          main social outlet. Known to his friends as "Bert," he
          associated with a small elite circle of Albanians. Although he had
          money he was very tight-fisted. Approached once for a contribution, he
          responded, "Well, which of my other charitable organizations
          would you have me give up in order that I can support yours?"
 
 As Tucker aged, he became more disillusioned with the capacities of
          government to address matters of social concern as he saw them. His
          fifth book, Your Money and What to Do With it (1960), was just
          that, a simple advisory on personal finance, and it ventured political
          commentary only in one spot. He castigated Roosevelt for taking the US
          currency off the gold standard. He also noted (p 55-56) "Senator
          Harry Byrd [of Virginia] ... as saying that the present national debt
          exceeds the value of all property in the United States of every kind
          and nature - land, buildings, machinery, railroads, personal
          possessions, and everything - regardless of who owns it. In other
          words, our nation is insolvent, our liabilities exceeding our assets.
          The carrying cost of this debt - the interest which must be paid
          sooner or later if our national credit is to be preserved - is
          terrific and is constantly increasing. State spending and state debts
          are getting constantly bigger, and the federal government seems
          determined to spend, waste, squander, and give away the money wrung
          from its taxpayers regardless of the size of the debt. Taxes are
          growing apace and the business of the country is operated for four
          months out of each year not for the profit of the owners or the
          workers but to support the government, for taxes take a third of our
          earnings." The rest of the chapter continues in the same vein.
 
 His last book, The Private School: Its Advantages, Its Problems,
          Its Financing is a 127 page treatise less about the value of
          private education than his expressions of alarm about the political
          and economic directions of the nation - for which he held the schools
          and colleges accountable. Published in 1965, three years before he
          died, it reflects his increasingly conservative political and economic
          thinking, if this is possible. Since he relied on Vantage Press, he
          likely paid for it himself. With his vituperative harping on America's
          drift to socialism and communism, it is no wonder that the book found
          little audience. He was just as disturbed by usurpation of state and
          local government powers by Washington. Quoting Woodrow Wilson, he
          wrote, "The history of liberty is the history of the limitation
          of government powers ..., the concentration of power is what always
          precedes the destruction of human liberties."
 
 His central argument for private schools is lost in the sweep of his
          other diatribes, where he argues that "Unlike the public schools
          they can implant a background of spiritual and moral values; and if
          desired by their patrons, they can teach a definite creed or sectarian
          theology. This is not desirable to some but to others it is, and there
          should be complete freedom of choice, but all schools should
          endeavor to promote a sense of spiritual and moral values in the minds
          of youth. [italics original] 
 The private school can also
          teach very definite political science and economics without being
          submitted to political pressure and control or threats of denial of
          funds. In questions of political philosophy and of economics, there is
          room for difference of opinion, and the honest and conscientious
          teacher will teach the philosophy which he believes to be sound. Call
          this 'indoctrination' if you like, but it is honest and to be
          encouraged; and there is no more reason why our youths should not be
          'indoctrinated' with a sound philosophy on such questions as our form
          of government and its preservation, the problem of inflation, the
          justification of interest, the management of the public debt, and
          similar questions of prime importance, than that they should be
          'indoctrinated' with the multiplication tables or the laws of motion."
          (p 42)
 
 A few pages later, he continues: "We note that former President
          Conant of Harvard is opposed to private schools. Just why it is hard
          to see, considering the vital part which private schools have played
          in the history of Harvard; but there they have their own way of doing
          things, as we can see from the present setup of their Department of
          Economics, apparently completely won over to the Marxist philosophy."
          (p 47) After commenting on the enormity of that university's bequests,
          he writes, "We wonder what the stockholders think of the way in
          which some of this money is used. Would they approve the teaching of
          economics in Harvard by the advisors of Kennedy, described 
 as
          essentially Fabian Socialists? 
 We find too that many favor
          teaching and textbooks written from the Marxist angle, and it is
          curious that so many who talk about broadmindedness, which it comes to
          a showdown, favor the teachings of Marx and oppose teaching anything
          in rebuttal. We find textbook publishers who report that the only
          textbooks that show a profit are those defending communism, socialism
          and a 'planned economy.'" (p 57-58)
 
 Yet many might accept the validity of his criticism of "some of
          the social sciences, and we do not mean the rubbish often included in
          'progressive' education but refer particularly to studies necessary if
          we are to be worthy of citizenship. Elementary economics, the ability
          to define such words as 'wealth,' 'rent,' 'wages,' 'interest,' and the
          knowledge of what determines price and fixes wages, also the basic
          relations of capital and labor, and the meaning of inflation, all are
          things to which every student should be introduced. There is a
          feeling, perhaps due to Carlyle's unfortunate comment on economics as
          'the dismal science,' that it is dull, boring and difficult. Generally
          presented as a mass of artificial phraseology, questionable
          statistics, algebraic equations and tiresome charts, it is pretty
          heavy; but, if properly taught, it can be made fascinating even to
          immature minds, for it is concerned with human desires and how to 
          gratify them. That it can be taught to mere children has been
          demonstrated by using simplified and abridged versions of Robinson
          Crusoe and Swiss Family Robinson, (p 70-71) The next
          section is a short summary of basic Georgist thought, but in the midst
          of a 127 page verbal onslaught, its value is lost. Tucker would have
          been better to stop writing after his book on how to manage money; in
          fact some sections of the earlier book are repeated at the end of this
          one - which make no sense here and are totally out of place. His views
          about paying taxes was unwavering, and his last will, composed in
          1966, a year after completing The Private School and two years
          before he died, leaves the bulk of his fortune to Albany Academy.
 
 Yet there are other legacies than his books that Gilbert Tucker
          leaves to us. He was, for a time, a Director on the Boards of the
          Henry George and Schalkenbach Foundations. He attended Georgist
          conferences, and took an active part. Clearly he had hopes that
          Georgist economic thought would reach a broader audience at some
          point, but opposed a project to abridge Progress and Poverty.
          In 1952, he chartered a non-profit corporation in Albany called the
          Economic Education League, Inc., which numbered among its trustees
          other well-known Georgists Edward Harwood and Wylie Young. Under this
          mark, he also wrote a pamphlet on "Housing and Slum Clearance at
          No Cost," and published under contract a Lehigh University study
          in 1958 on the feasibility of land value taxation in Pennsylvania. The
          ownership of his Common-Sense Economics text arguably reverts
          to this organization, since Stackpole Press no longer cares to hold
          title to it. He also wrote reviews of others' books for the Georgist
          publication Land and Freedom, and his "The Value of Land
          and Its Assessment" appeared in a 1953 issue of American
          Journal of Economics and Sociology. Several other short pieces on
          either George or his philosophy were published elsewhere, one in Scientific
          Monthly. There is evidence that WGY, the General Electric flagship
          radio station in Schenectady, carried a scheduled program hosted by
          Gilbert Tucker in the 1920s and 1930s. It was likely first in his
          capacity as representative of the State Health Department. But it
          occasionally focused on the philosophy of Henry George.
 
 I would like to see Tucker be better recognized among past Georgists,
          as he wrote clearly and helped maintain visibility of Georgist ideas.
          The Path to Prosperity is in the public domain as is Common-Sense
          Economics. The Baker Publishing Group, which bought the original
          publisher, Revell, in 1971, will allow us to reprint For the Good
          of All essentially at cost, and the Schalkenbach Foundation is the
          publisher of The Self-Supporting City.
 
 
 |