The Correspondence of Thomas Jefferson
By Subject
FREEDOM OF RELIGION
Certainly, no power to prescribe any religious exercise, or to assume
authority in religious discipline, has been delegated to the General
Government. It must then rest with the States, as far as it can be in
any human authority. But it is only proposed that I should
recommend, not prescribe a day of fasting and prayer. That is,
that I should indirectjy assume to the United States an
authority over religious exercises, which the Constitution has
directly precluded them from. It must be meant, too, that this
recommendation is to carry some authority, and to be sanctioned by
some penalty on those who disregard it; not indeed of fine and
imprisonment, but of some degree of proscription, perhaps in public
opinion. And does the change in the nature of the penalty make the
recommendation less a law of conduct for those to whom it is
directed? I do not believe it is for the interest of religion to
invite the civil magistrate to direct its exercises, its discipline,
or its doctrines; nor of the religious societies, that the General
Government should be invested with the power of effecting any
uniformity of time or matter among them. Fasting and prayer are
religious exercises; the enjoining them an act of discipline. Every
religious society has a right to determine for itself the times for
these exercises, and the objects proper for them, according. to their
own particular tenets; and this right can never be safer than in their
own hands, where the Constitution has deposited it.
to Samuel Miller (Reverend), 23 January 1808
|