Frank Chodorov's Disdain for Respectability
Laurie J. Quinby
[Originally published with the title, "Dominance
of Wealth in Government."
Reprinted from Land and Freedom, March-April, 1935]
The article by Frank Chodorov in Janunary-February number of LAND AND
FREEDOM, to my mind, is one of the finest specimens of logical
reasoning which I have met in many a day. It might be epitomized in
the simple statement that the Georgist philosophy has been handicapped
by "respectability" and that no leader of a Moses-calibre
has risen to carry it to triumph in its complete and uncompromising
form. My own impatient soul, longing for that "kingdom of heaven,"
urges me to say "amen." Then arises that kindly angel
Natural Law gently warning me, "Not so hasty, my little man."
Never must we ignore the fact of the invariableness of Natural Law.
Under that law we are taught that heaven is not gained by a single
bound, theological offers to the contrary notwithstanding. He who is
rescued from the glaring sun of a blazing desert must pass through
gradual stages toward normal light. Else all is surrounding darkness.
Or, to reverse the figure, after one has known naught but darkness,
suddenly to be plunged into the brilliant light of midday, is to be
blinded. So it is with mankind. He who has known nothing but tyranny
must grow into the blessings of freedom before he may understand the
grandeur of Liberty. Nature herself restrains the hasty step, because
she would build her structures without flaw that we may withstand the
storms of time.
We must distinguish between a compromise of principle and the details
through which we must realize the fruits of it. All human progress,
all individual advancement, civilization itself, is accomplished by
everlasting compromises regarding the details of achievement. But all
progress is stopped when we compromise with principle. This was well
illustrated in the course of Lincoln as expressed in his letter to
Horace Greeley. His one aim was to save the Union. If, day by day, he
saw that might best be achieved by this or that policy, he did not
hesitate to shift the policy. (I wish our present President could
realize this.) We must advance beyond error before we can realize it
for what is was. Polity must be held sacred. Policies through which it
may be realized may shift with the current of common thought.
Truth has a cunning way of insinuating its spirit into the heart of
all things. The heart of them is the soil in which that spirit
thrives.
There it grows, it expands, and, like the tender vine that finds a
crevice in the solid rock, bursts its environment to find the light of
day.
Throughout all history, wealth has been the dominant power in
government and all social order. I do not deprecate that fact. It is
right and just that this be so. My only quarrel is that they who have,
through special laws and privileges, secured that wealth, constitute
just a minority of mankind. Having it, that minority has dominated the
enactment of laws and their administration of government. It has grown
by what it fed on. Human rights which means natural rights it has
trampled under foot, until, even the trampled-upon (or, as an Irish
friend calls them, "the submerged tinth") seem to think that
such is heaven-ordained. Hardly attempting to rise from beneath the
feet that press them down, they peek about in worship of the power
that oppresses them. They praise those above them, for "giving
them work" as if "work" is the want of man. Poor sodden
mass! But, at least, the majority of those above them know that they
are oppressors. Therefore are they guilty, not so much in taking what
is surrendered to them, but in false instructions to the underlings
and in their cruel determination to maintain the fiendish system
through which their diabolical cruelties are effective. The relentless
hand of Natural Justice always has and always will, in time, scoop up
that parasitical group and hurl it into oblivion.
Now, if the "submerged tinth" which in fact is about ninety
per cent of the population are willing to persist in their own
ignorance, Nature is no more disposed to spare them from the effect of
their own stupidity than she is to spare the leaches who suck their
blood. They must learn leaches and leached alike that the highest
obligation of life is to be intelligent. Then to be intelligent,
intelligence will see to it that every form of privilege is stamped
from out our social life. When that desired event shall have arrived,
men will understand that Nature gives to toil, and to toil alone, her
boundless riches. Beggars and thieves both above and below the crust
will be no more. Cunning shall no longer thrive at the expense of
MANHOOD. Wealth, created by toil and enterprise, will be in the hands
of its creators. Being in the hands of the many, its force still will
dominate the making of laws, together with their interpretation and
administration. Then shall LIBERTY prevail over all.
Yes, I agree with Mr. Chodorov, that, to realize this happy state, a
Moses must arrive, for it must always be that the mass of men will
follow the strong, the masterful. But, when all is said, this truth
shall remain: That unless the followers be intelligent, their lack of
it will mean as it did with the Moses of that other day that their
leader shall not himself reach the promised land, and with his
personal failure so to do, neither shall the followers again as of old
realize the glory of his dreams. Or, as in the case of the later
Nazarene, lacking intelligence, they buried the beauty of His
teachings under the debris of superstition and theology, making His
crucifixion endure through the ages.
Let me repeat: The highest individual and social, moral and ethical
obligation of life is to be intelligent.
|