| 
 The Time Element in InterestDonald L. Thompson
 [Reprinted from Land and Freedom, July-August
          1937]
 
 In the last issue of LAND AND FREEDOM our fellow Georgeist, Raymond
          V. McNally, completely disposed of numerous theories dealing with the
          cause of interest. His arguments are unanswerable. It is to be
          regretted that even Henry George with all his ability to analyze
          should set up a theory regarding the cause of interest that is no more
          tenable than the ones he so successfully demolished. His interest
          theory is the one weak link in his great book, Progress and
          Poverty. Mr. McNally has very ably disposed of this theory.
 
 On the other hand I am not so sure that there is not a law of
          interest. Neither am I convinced by Mr. McNally's argument that what
          we term interest is merely "compensation for risk." If what
          we term interest is merely compensation for risk, then it occurs to me
          that under existing conditions interest rates would be much higher
          than they are, as the element of risk has steadily increased since the
          last industrial breakdown. Instead of going up as the element of risk
          has increased they have fallen, which only proves Mr. George's
          contention that wages and interest tend to rise and fall together.
          Surely no one will contend that investments are more secure now than
          they were during the years preceding the depression and that this
          accounts for the present lower interest rates. As a matter of fact
          investments are not nearly as secure, not even investments in
          government bonds, yet the interest rate is lower. If Mr. McNally is
          right they should be higher.
 
 While it is true that part of the commercial interest rate consists
          of insurance to cover risk, I am convinced that in addition to this
          there is true interest, which is payment for the use of capital.
 
 Despite the fact that Mr. McNally has upset the Bohm-Bawerk time
          theory as a cause of interest, I am still persuaded that the element
          of time does account for interest. Even Mr. George saw this dimly but
          confused it with his "reproductive forces of nature" theory.
          Time is a most important factor in the satisfying of human wants. A
          saving in time in the satisfaction of human desires is equivalent to
          greater earnings. We want things now and not ten to twenty years
          hence. This being the case we are willing to pay a premium for the use
          of capital or wealth, so as to more quickly satisfy our wants. Thus
          interest arises. I want a home, I can secure one by going to work over
          a period of years, but I want it now, hence I am willing to pay some
          owner of a home a premium for the use of it over and above the cost of
          depreciation and insurance to cover risk, and this premium is
          interest. It is quite obvious that as long as people feel that they
          are obtaining an advantage by borrowing, they will be willing to pay
          for this advantage. Interest therefore is natural and it is just. It
          is a reward for accumulation. It gives encouragement to store up 
          capital in excess of personal needs. If it is natural, then it can be
          said that there is a law of interest.
 
 
 |