| 
 Review of the BookThe Growth and Distribution of PopulationBy S. Vere Pearson
Gilbert M. Tucker
 [Reprinted from Land and Freedom,
          January-February 1936]
 
 In this work Dr. S. Vere Pearson has made a most valuable
          contribution to the literature of sociology and, more especially, to
          the literature of sound economics and the philosophy of Henry George.
          The book is a broad and masterly study of population trends and the
          deep underlying causes of changes in the people of the earth. It is
          marred by no narrow provincialism or nationalism, for it is based on
          world-wide conditions and deals with widely scattered lands and
          civilizations. The author is an Englishman, a graduate of Cambridge,
          and a physician, but he has given much study to American conditions
          and, for this reason as well as for his breadth of vision, the book is
          quite as valuable on this side of the water as on his.
 
 The book opens with a discussion of the problems of agriculture and
          food control, showing that our difficulties are attributable, not to
          any overcrowding or to limitations of nature, but to maladjustment and
          failure to use wisely and to distribute fairly what nature offers. He
          deals another crushing blow to the doctrines of Malthus and shows the
          fallacy of such statements as that of Mill: "The niggardliness of
          nature, not the injustice of society, is the cause of the penalty
          attached to overpopulation." By argument as well as by experience
          he demonstrates the error of such gloomy predictions as that made by
          Sir William Crookes nearly forty years ago that long ere now the world
          would be experiencing a real wheat famine. He shows how readily our
          food supply may be augmented, how there is abundant room and
          opportunity for all, if we will but use what nature has given us
          wisely and fairly. The theory of diminishing returns as applied to
          agricultural production is discredited for he points out that
          increasing population means increasing rather than diminishing
          production, pointing out that "The development of human skill
          coincidentally with the increase of numbers of human beings enables
          man to exist comfortably upon smaller and smaller areas of land."
          There is much in this section of the book worthy of study by rural
          economists.
 
 Such a study brings us naturally to the subject of systems of land
          tenure and their consequences, of course with one inevitable lesson;
          in the author's words, "It is the first duty of government to
          collect the rent of the land." Again he says: "Tranquility
          and good government can go hand in hand when governments recognize
          that their first duty is to collect their own revenue and cease from
          robbery by taxation." Throughout the book there is much wise
          economic teaching, sometimes in definite concrete form but more often
          by inference, for the book is written to plead no cause nor to
          substantiate any doc- trine, but simply as a study of population
          trends from which study the conclusions are deduced. It covers a wide
          range of matter and evidences so much reading, thought and study that
          to attempt to summarise an outline of its more than four hundred pages
           in a brief review would be inadequate and unfair. In its discussion
          of housing, town planning, emigration, resettlement schemes and the
          complications of transportation and traffic there is wealth of
          material which might be well studied by those interested in the
          problems of housing and slum clearance. Were the workers in these
          fields to get down to fundamentals and study the real essentials of
          such problems, instead of devoting themselves almost entirely to the
          superficial aspects of the case, far more progress, and more
          substantial progress, would be made. To rural workers and economists
          his treatment of the big questions of rural and urban problems and the
          drift to cities should prove enlightening and the discussion of birth,
          marriage and death rates, including a very wise and well balanced
          consideration of birth control, free from bias and prejudice, is to be
          commended. To the public health worker the whole book should prove
          invaluable.
 
 To readers of LAND AND FREEDOM perhaps the most interesting sections
          are those dealing with the functions and duties of government, the
          chapter on " Ground Values and Appraisals" (dealing very
          largely with American conditions) and the concluding chapters, "A
          Gracious Dispensation" and "Co-operation for the Commonweal,"
          but the book fairly bristles with good Single Tax lessons for, from
          whatever angle these big problems are approached, the same remedy is
          always deduced, and no part of the book should be overlooked. The
          disastrous effects of tariffs and trade restrictions and the threats
          which they offer to the peace of the world are all touched on, and the
          author is clear-visioned enough to see the folly of the unsound
          features of our American " New Deal," especially in the
          wanton destruction and limitation of the very things which we must
          have if we are to prosper.
 
 To the Single Tax cause the book is perhaps an almost unique
          contribution. The name of Henry George is mentioned only three times
          and the Single Tax scarcely at all, but this does not detract in the
          least from the merit of the work. Its unusual value to our mind is
          that it is a dispassionate study of a big question the whole problem
          of population and its tendencies and it is from this disinterested
          study, at first glance a bit remote from taxation theories and social
          betterment, that the lesson is drawn as to the obvious correction of
          difficulties. If the book finds its way, as we hope it does, into the
          proper hands, it will unquestionably be the means of enlisting the
          interest and support of many intelligent leaders in the quest for a
          better and saner organization of society. Agricultural students and
          students of rural sociology, housing authorities and public health
          workers, all who are students of those subjects embraced under the
          somewhat vague term of demography, all these are too often cold to the
          usual arguments for the reforms advocated by Henry George, especially
          when the approach is so often from standpoints of purely fiscal and
          taxation measures. To all these large and influential groups this book
          should serve as a sound introduction to a wiser philosophy of society
          and to bring it to their attention will mean a material accession to
          the ranks of those who see that only by following the teachings of
          Henry George shall we find our way to a greater measure of justice and
          a better social order. Read the book, and bring it to the attention of
          those to whom so often much existing Single Tax literature makes but
          little appeal.
 
 
 |