Review of the book
The Possibility of Progress
Mark Braund
Tony Vickers
[2005]
In 1999, when I ran the British Henry George Foundation, a benefactor
offered £10,000 to any well known author, new to the subject of
land value taxation (LVT), who would write "the book that Henry
George would have written if he'd been alive today". Although
this is Mark Braund's first book, I believe he could have earned the
prize. Unfortunately for him, the HGF benefactor and his offer died in
2002.
br> Copiously researched and crisply but elegantly written, Braund
has put together a series of arguments addressing the modern conundrum
of growing poverty alongside growing 'progress'. He leads us
inevitably towards the conclusion that the path of neo-classical
economics has been an unnecessary and potentially fatal cul-de-sac
from which only a restoration of 'common wealth' (resource rents) to
society as public revenue can save us. It is rare for any exposition
of the case for LVT to be so thorough, unemotional and yet readable.
Not until half-way through chapter ten, after 210 out of 284 pages,
does Braund introduce Ricardo's classic law of rent (like the law of
gravity, not a law that can be repealed). Henry George's role in the
history of political economy briefly follows suit.
Most of the book is spent examining pieces of the puzzle of
humanity's failure to achieve economic and social justice. Defining
progress as "movement towards a more equitable, inclusive and
sustainable global social order", he carefully dispels any notion
that such progress is impossible, calling on a range of writing from
such disciplines as: socio-biology; behavioural genetics;
anthropology; economic history; ethics; ecology; global finance and
debt re-structuring.
Braund shows that there is nothing inevitable about progress but that
it is in our grasp if we collectively choose to challenge the
conventional wisdom of establishment economists and rulers. No part of
humanity is more - or less - well adapted biologically or culturally
to achieve the kind of progress that we almost all aspire to: what he
calls "universalism". This can be described as "when no
human being should take action, or participate in group actions, which
compromise the Golden Rule" of human behaviour: something like
'do as you would be done by'.
In his chapter "Moral Development" Braund points out that "in
the modern world virtually all acts of spending and consumption have
such a dimension" that makes it possible, given sufficient
information, to decide whether to support or undermine this Rule. If,
as he says, "ethics and politics are inseparable" and
humanity has "now taken absolute conscious control over the means
by which we provide for our physical survival, it follows that ethics
can no longer be considered without reference to economics".
Moreover "politics is the tool applied by society in its
management of the economy" and "an economy which relies
exclusively on competition can never provide for universal needs".
|